Northern Virginia boasts one of the country's most successful high occupancy vehicle (HOV) systems. More than 44,000 travelers choose to use one of Northern Virginias three HOV freeway corridors[6] for their morning commutes. HOV lanes have become an integral part of the Washington Metropolitan regions transit system. The program restricts certain highway lanes to exclusive use by multi-occupant vehicles at peak travel times to encourage carpooling, vanpooling and transit bus ridership.
The bus-only lanes that opened on
the Shirley Highway in 1969 were the first HOV lanes in the country.[7]
NVTC managed a major demonstration of express buses in this corridor. These lanes
were then opened up to high occupancy private automobiles to promote more efficient fuel
use in 1973. Construction of HOV lanes throughout the country progressed slowly in the
1970s and then began to pick-up in the mid-1980s to early 1990s.
They can:
· Increase the average number of
persons per motor vehicle using a highway over conventional lanes;
· Preserve the person-moving
capacity of a lane as demands for transportation capacity increase;
· Enhance bus transit operations;
· Support air quality goals;
· Serve a variety of employment
centers in urban and suburban areas; and
· Provide predictable travel times
even during periods of high demand for highway capacity.
Currently, HOV lanes exist in four Northern Virginia corridors: the 27-mile Shirley
Highway (I-395)
I-95 corridor from
Washington, DC to the south of the Beltway as far as Route 234 near Dumfries in Prince
William County; the 27-mile I-66 corridor both inside and
outside the Beltway from Rosslyn to Route 234 in Manassas; the 11-mile VA 267 (Dulles Toll
Road), which has a concurrent-flow HOV lane between Route 28 near Dulles International
Airport and the main toll plaza just west of Route 7; and Route 1 and VA 400 (Washington
Street) through Old Town, Alexandria. These HOV lanes play a crucial role in the
regions transportation system.
The success of
Virginias HOV system is the result of substantial public and private investment in
HOV lanes, park-and-ride lots, transit and car/vanpooling services, rideshare matching services, and popular
slug opportunitiesa form of
casual carpooling.
Mode Share
As part of its core travel monitoring program, the National
Capital Region Transportation Planning Board of the Metropolitan Washington Council of
Governments (COG/TPB) conducts cordon studies that count the number of persons by travel
mode. The last Metro Core Cordon Count was completed in 1999 while the latest Beltway
Cordon count took place in 2001. Figure 33 shows the counting stations for the Beltway
and Metro Core Cordon study. Travel counts were conducted from 6:30 AM until 9:30 AM in
order to capture the majority, but not all, commuter trips.

Figure 34 shows that when offered good HOV[8]
infrastructure and transit service, less than half of all peak period commuters choose to
drive alone.[9] Figures
38 and 39 include the absolute numbers of commuters in the corridor as well the
mode shares. The share of transit commuters increases closer to the urban corea
reflection of the greater degree of transit options.

Another fact that emerges from examining the figures is the very strong shares of persons moving in the major commuting corridors via public transit. The appropriate places and times to measure transits shares of commuting markets are during peak travel hours in corridors in which meaningful investments in transit services have been made. As can be seen, public transit services in Northern Virginia capture very significant shares in these major corridors to the benefit of transit customers as well as to those that choose to drive alone (or with others) in automobiles.
|
SOV |
HOV(2+) |
Bus |
||
I-395 |
|
|
|
|
|
Passengers |
15900 |
17000 |
3500 |
0 |
0 |
% |
44% |
47% |
10% |
0% |
0% |
Route 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Passengers |
9000 |
2900 |
200 |
11000 |
2200 |
% |
36% |
11% |
1% |
43% |
9% |
I-66 |
|
|
|
|
|
Passengers |
1900 |
7600 |
700 |
10600 |
1800 |
% |
8% |
34% |
3% |
47% |
8% |
VA 267 |
|
|
|
|
|
Passengers |
6700 |
5800 |
3300 |
0 |
0 |
% |
42% |
37% |
21% |
0% |
0% |
Source: 1999 COG/TPB Metro Core Cordon Count,
A.M. Peak Period.
Figure
39: 1999 Metro Core Cordon Count Mode Share
Summary for Major HOV Corridors
6:30 AM 9:30 AM
|
SOV |
HOV(2+) |
Bus |
Metrorail |
VRE |
I-395 |
|
|
|
|
|
Passengers
|
21300 |
21600 |
8200 |
0 |
0 |
% |
42% |
42% |
16% |
0% |
0% |
Route 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Passengers
|
6800 |
3000 |
200 |
14100 |
1500 |
% |
27% |
12% |
1% |
55% |
6% |
I-66 |
|
|
|
|
|
Passengers
|
3300 |
13400 |
3700 |
23300 |
1300 |
% |
7% |
30% |
8% |
52% |
3% |
Source: 1999 COG/TPB Metro Core Cordon Count,
A.M. Peak Period.
Travel
Time Savings
As shown in Figures 40 and 41 one of the notable benefits of using Northern Virginias HOV facilities is the substantial reduction in travel time over non-HOV travel. The HOV lanes usually move at speeds approaching the speed limit, while the parallel conventional lanes move at much slower speeds due to congestion. Survey data show that morning commuters using the HOV lanes shave about one half-hour off their commute on I-95/I-395 and I-66 and about 20 minutes off their commute on the Dulles Toll Road in comparison to commuters in the parallel conventional lanes[J1]. Furthermore, commute time is more predictable in each of the corridors for those who choose the HOV lanes.[10]
Figure
40: Speed and Travel
Time Comparison for HOV and Conventional Lanes
|
||||||
Corridor |
HOV Lane Speed (mph) |
Conventional Lane Speed (mph) |
HOV Lane Travel Time
(minutes) |
Conventional Lane Travel Time
(minutes) |
Minutes Saved With HOV |
Minutes Saved Per Mile |
I-95/I-395 (northbound) |
61 |
29 |
27 |
58 |
31 |
1.12 |
I-66 (eastbound)* |
40 |
25 |
41 |
69 |
28 |
1.02 |
VA 267/I-66 (eastbound) T.
Roosevelt Bridge |
45 |
29 |
31 |
51 |
20 |
0.80 |
Source:
1999 Performance of Regional High-Occupancy Vehicle Facilities on Freeways in
the Washington Region: An Analysis of Travel Times. Final Draft. National Capital
Region Transportation Planning Board of the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments
(October 6, 2000).
* HOV travel time savings is more reliable inside the Beltway than outside the Beltway. For the eastbound A.M. peak period, the standarD deviation of elapsed travel times in the HOV lanes is 1 minutes 46 seconds for the inside-the-Beltway portion of the run and 5 minutes 36 seconds for the outside-the-Beltway portion.
Figure
41: Speed and Travel
Time Comparison for HOV and Conventional Lanes
|
||||||
Corridor |
HOV Lane Speed (mph) |
Conventional Lane Speed (mph) |
HOV Lane Travel Time (Minutes) |
Conventional Lane Travel Time
(Minutes) |
Minutes Saved With HOV |
Minutes Saved Per Mile |
I-95/I-395
(southbound)
|
60 |
26 |
27.5 |
64 |
36.5 |
1.34 |
| I-66 (westbound) From VA
end of T. Roosevelt Bridge to VA 234 27.4 miles |
51 |
31 |
32 |
57 |
25 |
0.91 |
|
54 |
43 |
36 |
9 |
0.37
|
|
Source:
1999 Performance of Regional High-Occupancy Vehicle Facilities on Freeways in
the Washington Region: An Analysis of Travel Times. Final Draft. National Capital
Region Transportation Planning Board of the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments
(October 6, 2000).
Person
Carrying Capacity
Figure 42: Person
Carrying Capacity Comparison for
|
|||||||
HOV Facility |
Persons |
Direction |
Restricted Hours |
A.M. HOV Lane Person Movement* |
A.M. Conventional Lane Person Movement |
A.M. Persons Pen HOV Lane, Per Hour* |
A.M.
Persons Per Conventional Pane, Per Hour |
I-395 North of Glebe Road |
HOV-3 |
Northbound |
6:00 A.M. - 9:00 A.M. |
22,500 (2 LANES) |
26,400 (4 LANES) |
3,800 |
2,200 |
I-95 North of Newington |
HOV-3 |
Northbound |
|||||